Skip to content

Up-Wordz.com

Let Dr. Mike Zizzi teach you to uplift your world via truly *authentic* writing (and speaking! and listening!) We need more of YOUR voice (not AI's).

  • Home
  • login
  • About Mike
  • Contact Mike
  • “Big-picture” concepts
    • foundational issues
    • Controversy Corner
  • Writing Lessons
    • “The Method” in three stages
      • Stage 1 posts
      • Stage 2 posts
      • Stage 3 posts
    • Essential Additions
    • Grammar & Punctuation
  • Comm Soup
    • authenticity
    • dialogue
    • rhetoric of the road
    • speaking
    • listening
  • Stories, Poems, & Pics
    • Stories of communication
    • original poetry
    • photography
  • In the News
    • national media
    • local media
    • sports – media coverage
  • Toggle search form

Stage 2-d: Run-on or compound?

Posted on April 1, 2026May 29, 2026 By MikeZ No Comments on Stage 2-d: Run-on or compound?

Welcome back. In the prior post, labeled Stage 2-c, we explored — and in some ways exploded — the idea of any universally proper sentence length. I hope that essay helped you to take an interesting and useful step along our Stage 2 pathway.

We now move to the next lesson, Stage 2-d, where we build upon the idea that sentences can work great, in many ways, and at many lengths, from one word to hundreds or even thousands. True! That’s the overall aim of this second main “stage” of my System of Activated Writing: how and why to add to a sentence, beyond just its essence.

That’s how we began this whole program by looking at the brief side of sentences — their essence, the team of subject and predicate.

A sentence of 100 words could be “grammatically reducible” to a two-word “kernel,” that is, the simple (one-word) versions of the S and P.  In this way (to give a brief example), the sentence “My talented and courageous friend, Alex, rocked the pregame show in front of half the town” reduces to the kernel, “Alex rocked.”

From the minimum, the kernel, we can either stop there (pretty rare, but occasionally a cool move) or go on and add further substance, as we craft our present “stepping stone.” We can “add substance” in many ways, whether we’re adding description to our subjects and predicates or, quite differently, adding new “parts“ to the sentence.

Q: How many parts can a sentence have? A: How many rooms can a house have?

That’s an analogy I have used in class, for years. But I always added that making the house large, with lots of rooms, requires knowing how to build such a house, which requires more “engineering,” or else it might fall down or have other problems . . . just like a sentence!

Then I would teach them this very sentence engineering, as you are learning, yourself, if you are putting in the mental effort. I am doing my best to hold your attention and clarify my system. You have to try, too.

In this next lesson, we will take a close look at one very common, important, and versatile method for adding substance to a sentence: adding a second main clause! We can add “lesser” parts, too. We’ll look at many options for that in lesson Stage 2-e, which follows this one. But, for now and for reasons I’ll soon present, let’s focus on adding not a lesser, but a “greater” part to our sentence — namely, another sentence!

Before we dig into the hows, whys, whens, and when-nots of this prospect, here’s a brief pre-quiz to check on what you might already know and also to preview where we’re going, here in Stage 2-d.

 

Results

Congrats! You’ve correctly answered at least three of the four questions. If you aced the quiz with four of four correct, you are way ahead of most writers, at least in this important regard

Oopsie. Passing this quiz requiires at least three correct answers. Now that you’ve seen these items once, why not try again?

Share your score!
Tweet your score!
Tweet your score!
Share to other

#1. Which of these sentence show correct punctuation? Select all that apply.

Previous
Finish

 

MZ-general Tags:ESL, grammar, grammar rules, independent clause, language, main clause, online writing, predicate, rhetoric, sentence, Sentence structure, subject, syntax, writing

Post navigation

Previous Post: Stage 2-a: From “Simple” to “Surprise Me” – Introduction

Related Posts

Less is “more or less”. . . LESS! Essential Additions
Stage 1-a: “The Essence of a Sentence” – Introduction MZ-general
Stage 1-d: Exceptions to the rule (that MCs are “essential”) MZ-general
How I met “The Father of Listening” listening
Stage 2-c: The proper length of a sentence MZ-general
Stage 1-b: What “one thing” does every sentence need? MZ-general

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Posts

  • Stage 2-d: Run-on or compound?
  • Stage 2-a: From “Simple” to “Surprise Me” – Introduction
  • Stage 2-b: Across the muck . . . we need *stepping stones*!
  • Stage 2-c: The proper length of a sentence
  • Writing Lesson #1: Not “all in one chunk”

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

Archives

  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • November 2025

Categories

  • authenticity
  • Controversy Corner
  • dialogue
  • Essential Additions
  • foundational issues
  • Grammar & Punctuation
  • listening
  • MZ-general
  • photography
  • rhetoric of the road
  • speaking
  • Stage 1 posts
  • Stage 2 posts
  • tales of communication
  • Why we're here — pls read first
  • Writing Lessons

Copyright 2026 - Up-Wordz.com